Influence of Extensometer on Test Value of Yield Strength of Different Materials
![](/skin/Gold/line_sep1.gif)
摘 要
分别对有明显屈服和无明显屈服的材料进行室温、高温拉伸试验,对比了使用引伸计与未使用引伸计所测试的屈服强度的差异,同时结合力-变形曲线和力-位移曲线,探讨了使用引伸计和未使用引伸计测得的屈服强度不一致的原因。结果表明:室温拉伸实验时,对于无明显屈服的材料,装夹引伸计测得的屈服强度小于未装夹引伸计测得的;对于有明显屈服的材料,装夹引伸计与不装夹引伸计测得的屈服强度相差不大;高温拉伸实验时,无明显屈服的材料和有明显屈服的材料,在装夹引伸计时测得的屈服强度均小于不装夹引伸计时测得的。
![](flash/relate.gif)
![](flash/relate.gif)
![](flash/relate.gif)
![](flash/relate.gif)
![](flash/relate.gif)
![](flash/relate.gif)
![](flash/relate.gif)
![](flash/relate.gif)
![](flash/relate.gif)
![](flash/relate.gif)
Abstract
The tensile tests at room temperature and high temperature were carried out for materials with obvious yield and no obvious yield. The yield strength measured by the extensometer and unused extensometer was compared. At the same time, combining the force-deformation curve and the force-displacement curve, the reasons for the difference of the yield strength measured by the extensometer and unused extensometer were discussed. The results show that the yield streghth measured by the clamped extensometer is less than that of the non-clamp extensometer for the materials with no obvious yield strength at room temperature tensile test. For the materials with obvious yield, the yield strength of the extensometer is similar to that of the non-clamp extensometer at room temperature tensile test. At high temperature tensile test, the yield strength of the materials with obvious or no obvious yield measured by the clamped extensometer is less than that of the non-clamp extensometer.
中图分类号 TG115.5 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl201803005
所属栏目 试验技术与方法
基金项目
收稿日期 2017/7/10
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
![](/skin/blank.gif)
作者单位点击查看
![](/skin/blank.gif)
备注丁阳(1987-),男,工程师,主要从事金属材料的研究,dingyang@shanghai-electric.com
引用该论文: DING Yang,GU Jialei,XIE Xiaoyu. Influence of Extensometer on Test Value of Yield Strength of Different Materials[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2018, 54(3): 175~180
丁阳,顾佳磊,谢晓宇. 引伸计对不同材料屈服强度测试值的影响[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2018, 54(3): 175~180
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
![请选择您对本文的评价](/skin/Gold/evaluation/ev_01.gif)
![您认为本文一无是处!](/skin/Gold/evaluation/ev_02.gif)
![您认为本文较差,没啥用!](/skin/Gold/evaluation/ev_03.gif)
![您认为本文一般,没太大参考价值](/skin/Gold/evaluation/ev_04.gif)
![您认为本文尚可,值得参考](/skin/Gold/evaluation/ev_05.gif)
![您认为本文很好,值得推荐](/skin/Gold/evaluation/ev_06.gif)
参考文献
【1】黄正阳,文光平,周青,等. 引伸计对TC4钛合金规定非比例延伸强度不确定度的影响[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2016,52(5):295-299.
【2】机械工业理化检验人员技术培训和资格鉴定委员会. 力学性能试验[M]. 上海:上海科学普及出版社,2003.
【3】孔令峰,葛俊森,冯涛. 试验速率对锚杆杆体力学性能的影响[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2016,52(11):778-780.
【4】GB/T 228.1-2010金属材料拉伸试验第1部分:室温试验方法[S].
【2】机械工业理化检验人员技术培训和资格鉴定委员会. 力学性能试验[M]. 上海:上海科学普及出版社,2003.
【3】孔令峰,葛俊森,冯涛. 试验速率对锚杆杆体力学性能的影响[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2016,52(11):778-780.
【4】GB/T 228.1-2010金属材料拉伸试验第1部分:室温试验方法[S].
相关信息