Tripping Analysis and Standardization of Drill Lifting Subs
![](/skin/Gold/line_sep1.gif)
摘 要
通过对某油田钻具提升短节失效原因进行大量调查研究及分析,认为钻具提升短节脱扣的主要原因是其本身细牙圆螺纹接头连接强度不足所致。API标准已废除了该钻具接头与管体连接的细牙圆螺纹接头和量规标准,而国内外当时还没有钻具提升短节标准。为从根本上解决钻具提升短节脱扣问题,笔者制定了新型钻具提升短节技术标准,随后又制定了SY/T 5699—1995提升短节石油天然气行业标准及API钻具提升短节标准,此项标准已经在全世界范围内广泛应用,使用效果良好。
![](flash/relate.gif)
![](flash/relate.gif)
![](flash/relate.gif)
![](flash/relate.gif)
![](flash/relate.gif)
![](flash/relate.gif)
Abstract
The investigation and failure analysis were made on one drill lifting sub of one oil field. It was considered that the main cause of the tripping failure of the lifting sub was the insufficient connection strength of the fine round thread fittings. Such fine round thread fittings and its measure gauge had been abandoned by API standard, but there was no standard for drill lifting subs at home and abroad at that time. In order to solve the tripping problem of lifting subs, a new technical specification was put forward, and then lifting subs standard for oil and gas industrial standard (SY/T 5699—1995) and API specification was established. The standard was applied all over the world with good effect so far.
中图分类号 TE931 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl201601010
所属栏目 标准化
基金项目
收稿日期 2015/3/31
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
![](/skin/blank.gif)
作者单位点击查看
![](/skin/blank.gif)
备注吕拴录(1957-),男,教授级高级工程师,学士。
引用该论文: LV Shuan-lu,TENG Xue-qing,LI Zhong-quan,YANG Cheng-xin,LI Ning,WEN Zhi-ming,XU Yong-kang,SHI Gui-jun,DU Tao,WANG Jun-you. Tripping Analysis and Standardization of Drill Lifting Subs[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2016, 52(1): 36~38
吕拴录,腾学清,李中全,杨成新,李宁,文志明,徐永康,石桂军,杜涛,王俊友. 钻具提升短节脱扣分析及标准化[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2016, 52(1): 36~38
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
![请选择您对本文的评价](/skin/Gold/evaluation/ev_01.gif)
![您认为本文一无是处!](/skin/Gold/evaluation/ev_02.gif)
![您认为本文较差,没啥用!](/skin/Gold/evaluation/ev_03.gif)
![您认为本文一般,没太大参考价值](/skin/Gold/evaluation/ev_04.gif)
![您认为本文尚可,值得参考](/skin/Gold/evaluation/ev_05.gif)
![您认为本文很好,值得推荐](/skin/Gold/evaluation/ev_06.gif)
参考文献
【1】吕拴录.139.7×7.72 mm J55长圆螺纹套管脱扣原因分析[J].钻采工艺,2005,28(2): 73-77.
【2】袁鹏斌,吕拴录,姜涛,等.长圆螺纹套管脱扣原因分析[J].石油矿场机械,2007,36(10): 68-72.
【3】LV Shuan-lu,HAN Yong,QIN Chang-yi, et al. Analysis of well casing connection pullout[J].Engineering Failure Analysis,2006,13(4): 638-645.
【4】吕拴录,袁鹏斌,张伟文,等.某井N80钢级套管脱扣和粘扣原因分析[J].钢管,2010,39(5): 57-61.
【5】吕拴录.139.7×7.72 mm J55长圆螺纹套管脱扣原因分析[J].钻采工艺,2005,28(2): 73-77.
【6】袁鹏斌,吕拴录,姜涛,等.长圆螺纹套管脱扣原因分析[J].石油矿场机械,2007,36(10): 68-72.
【7】聂采军,吕拴录,周杰,等.177.8 mm偏梯形螺纹接头套管脱扣原因分析[J].钢管,2010,39(3): 19-23.
【8】骆发前,吕拴录,周杰,等.塔里木油田钻柱转换接头失效原因分析及预防措施[J].石油钻探技术,2010,38(1): 80-83.
【9】腾学清,吕拴录,宋周成,等.某井特殊螺纹套管粘扣和脱扣原因分析[J].理化检验-理化检验,2011,47(4): 261-264.
【10】吕拴录,贾立强,樊文刚,等.进口339.7 mm套管在固井过程中脱扣原因分析[J].理化检验-物理分册,2012,48(2): 130-136.
【11】宋周成,吕拴录,秦宏德,等.套管柱在下井过程中脱扣原因分析[J].理化检验-物理分册,2012,48(增刊): 347-351.
【2】袁鹏斌,吕拴录,姜涛,等.长圆螺纹套管脱扣原因分析[J].石油矿场机械,2007,36(10): 68-72.
【3】LV Shuan-lu,HAN Yong,QIN Chang-yi, et al. Analysis of well casing connection pullout[J].Engineering Failure Analysis,2006,13(4): 638-645.
【4】吕拴录,袁鹏斌,张伟文,等.某井N80钢级套管脱扣和粘扣原因分析[J].钢管,2010,39(5): 57-61.
【5】吕拴录.139.7×7.72 mm J55长圆螺纹套管脱扣原因分析[J].钻采工艺,2005,28(2): 73-77.
【6】袁鹏斌,吕拴录,姜涛,等.长圆螺纹套管脱扣原因分析[J].石油矿场机械,2007,36(10): 68-72.
【7】聂采军,吕拴录,周杰,等.177.8 mm偏梯形螺纹接头套管脱扣原因分析[J].钢管,2010,39(3): 19-23.
【8】骆发前,吕拴录,周杰,等.塔里木油田钻柱转换接头失效原因分析及预防措施[J].石油钻探技术,2010,38(1): 80-83.
【9】腾学清,吕拴录,宋周成,等.某井特殊螺纹套管粘扣和脱扣原因分析[J].理化检验-理化检验,2011,47(4): 261-264.
【10】吕拴录,贾立强,樊文刚,等.进口339.7 mm套管在固井过程中脱扣原因分析[J].理化检验-物理分册,2012,48(2): 130-136.
【11】宋周成,吕拴录,秦宏德,等.套管柱在下井过程中脱扣原因分析[J].理化检验-物理分册,2012,48(增刊): 347-351.
相关信息