An Evaluation Method for Near Inspection Surface Defect Tested by the TOFD Secondary Wave
摘 要
在TOFD检测过程中, 因直通波宽度而产生的近扫查面盲区对检测影响很大。为精确定量位于近扫查面盲区的缺陷, 制作了人工缺陷试块, 对其采用常规TOFD以及TOFD二次波分别进行扫查。对比两种扫查方式所得TOFD图像可见, 常规TOFD技术对近扫查面缺陷极易漏检且无法定量, 而利用TOFD二次波扫查方式得到的图像能够显著分辨出缺陷并能精确定量, 因此可弥补常规TOFD检测中对近扫查面缺陷检出能力的不足。
Abstract
The dead zone of inspection surface could not be avoided when using TOFD technique due to the width of lateral wave. In order to solve the problem, the block with given depth of artificial defect, which were respectively inspected by traditional and secondary wave TOFD technique. The result, compared with the different images, was that the defect near the inspection surface was hard to be quantified as well as detected by the former of two TOFD methods. However, the defect could be obviously recognized and accurately measured by the latter method. So the traditional TOFD inspection accompanied with secondary wave TOFD was the better way to avoid the dead zone near the inspection surface.
中图分类号 TG115.28
所属栏目 试验研究
基金项目
收稿日期 2008/10/31
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注孙忠波(1981-), 男, 硕士, 多年从事金属性能分析及无损检测工作。
引用该论文: SUN Zhong-Bo,QI Xiang-Qian,ZHANG Ping. An Evaluation Method for Near Inspection Surface Defect Tested by the TOFD Secondary Wave[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2009, 31(9): 694~696
孙忠波,齐向前,张平. TOFD检测中采用二次波评定近扫查面缺陷尺寸的方法[J]. 无损检测, 2009, 31(9): 694~696
被引情况:
【1】陈振华,胡怀辉,卢超, "基于超声TOFD法直通波幅度分布的近表面缺陷检测",无损检测 35, 47-50(2013)
【2】郑红霞,孙忠波, "TOFD检测中扫查方式与检测盲区的关系",无损检测 33, 43-46(2011)
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】伊新.TOFD检测技术基本原理及其应用探讨[J].特种设备安全技术,2008,10(2):54-56.
【2】CEN/TS 14751 TOFD on Weld Seams[S].
【3】Charlesworth J P. Engineering Applications of Ultrasonic Time-of-Flight Diffraction[M]. UK: Research Studies Press Ltd,2001.
【4】李衍.超声TOFD原理和方法要领[J].无损检测,2007,29(2):88-93.
【2】CEN/TS 14751 TOFD on Weld Seams[S].
【3】Charlesworth J P. Engineering Applications of Ultrasonic Time-of-Flight Diffraction[M]. UK: Research Studies Press Ltd,2001.
【4】李衍.超声TOFD原理和方法要领[J].无损检测,2007,29(2):88-93.
相关信息