搜索热:余辉 2006
扫一扫 加微信
首页 > 期刊论文 > 论文摘要
埋地管道动态直流杂散电流干扰评估及防护技术的研究现状
          
Research Status in Assessment and Protection Techniques of Dynamic DC Stray Current Interference on Buried Pipelines

摘    要
随着我国埋地管道铺设里程的不断增长,以及交通运输行业的快速发展,城市轨道交通与管道平行或交叉的情况越来越多,由动态直流杂散电流干扰引起的管道腐蚀问题也越来越被人们所关注。分别从动态直流杂散电流干扰的现场监检测、评判标准及其缓解措施等方面,介绍了国内外动态直流杂散电流对埋地管道干扰的研究现状和进展,并对未来动态直流杂散电流干扰的研究方向进行了展望。
标    签 埋地管道   动态直流杂散电流干扰   监检测   缓解措施   buried pipeline   dynamic DC stray current interference   monitoring and testing   mitigation measure  
 
Abstract
With the continuous increase in the length of buried pipelines in China and the rapid development of transportation industry, there are more and more situations in which urban rail traffic and pipelines are parallel or intersecting. The pipeline corrosion caused by dynamic DC stray current interference also attracts more attentions. The research status and development of dynamic DC stray current interference on buried pipelines at home and abroad are introduced on the aspects of on-site monitoring, evaluation criteria and mitigation measures. The research trend of the dynamic DC stray current interference is proposed.

中图分类号 TG172.84   DOI 10.11973/fsyfh-201806001

 
  中国光学期刊网论文下载说明


所属栏目 专论

基金项目 国家留学基金项目(201606465052);国家重点研发计划专项项目(2016YFC0802101;2016YFC0802103)

收稿日期 2017/12/27

修改稿日期

网络出版日期

作者单位点击查看


引用该论文: QIN Huimin,DU Yeqiang,LÜ,Chao,DU Yanxia. Research Status in Assessment and Protection Techniques of Dynamic DC Stray Current Interference on Buried Pipelines[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2018, 39(6): 409


论文评价
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
分享论文
分享到新浪微博 分享到腾讯微博 分享到人人网 分享到 Google Reader 分享到百度搜藏分享到Twitter

参考文献
【1】高鹏,王培鸿,王海英,等. 2014年中国油气管道建设新进展[J]. 国际石油经济,2015,23(3):68-74.
 
【2】陈耀,严显智,阮建平,等. 油气管道地铁杂散电流直接排流技术应用[J]. 石油化工腐蚀与防护,2017,34(4):45-47.
 
【3】计雪松,秦朝葵. 杂散电流对埋地燃气管道的腐蚀及其监测[J]. 上海煤气,2007(4):12-15.
 
【4】刘文权. 城市地铁杂散电流对埋地输油管道的危害[J]. 全面腐蚀控制,2014,28(11):29-32.
 
【5】颜达峰,刘乃勇,袁鹏斌,等. 地铁维修基地杂散电流对埋地钢质管道的腐蚀及防护措施[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2013,34(8):739-742.
 
【6】高玉珍. 轨交杂散电流对天然气主干网的腐蚀影响及防护探究[J]. 上海煤气,2016(2):6-11.
 
【7】徐颢,李代莉. 轨道交通直流杂散电流给埋地钢管防腐系统带来的新风险[J]. 城市燃气,2016(3):12-17.
 
【8】吴祥祖,张庆贺,高卫平. 地铁杂散电流产生机理及其防护措施[J]. 建筑安全,2003(5):28-30.
 
【9】ZAKOWSKI K,DAROWICKI K,ORLIKOWSKI J,et al. Electrolytic corrosion of water pipeline system in the remote distance from stray currents-case study[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials,2016,4:116-124.
 
【10】BERTOLINI L,PEDEFERRI P,BAZZONI B,et al. Measurements of ohmic drop free potential in the presence of stray current[C]//Corrosion 1998. Houston,TX:NACE International,1998:98560.
 
【11】ZAKOWSKI K,SOKÓLSKI W. Numeric method of IR elimination from measurement results of potential of underground pipelines in the zone of interaction of stray currents[J]. Corrosion Science,1999,41(11):2213-2222.
 
【12】ZAKOWSKI K,DAROWICKI K. Potential changes in an electric field and electrolytic corrosion[J]. Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials,2003,50(1):25-33.
 
【13】DAROWICKI K,ZAKOWSKI K. A New time-frequency detection method of stray current field interference on metal[J]. Corrosion Science,2004,46(5):1061-1070.
 
【14】ZAKOWSKI K. The determination and identification of stray current source influences on buried pipelines using time/frequency analysis[J]. Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials,2009,56(6):330-333.
 
【15】滕延平,蔡培培,徐承伟,等. 应用同步监测法定位管道杂散电流的干扰源[J]. 油气储运,2011,30(5):347-349.
 
【16】赵晋云,滕延平,刘玲莉,等. 新大线管道杂散电流干扰的分析与防护[J]. 管道技术与设备,2007(2):38-40.
 
【17】PARKER G W,WALTON J. Non-contact stray current measurements in a multi-line,multi-crossing pipeline corridor[C]//Corrosion 2007. Houston,TX:NACE International,2007:07649.
 
【18】刘军. 埋地管道杂散电流干扰检测与治理[J]. 化学工程与装备,2010(11):78-80.
 
【19】MARTINEZ S,IVANKOVICA,KEKEZ K. Stray surrent detection on hazardous liquid buried pipelines as a part of pipeline integrity management[C]//CEOCOR 2014. Weimar,Germany:CEOCOR,2014:22-30.
 
【20】GREENBERGER S,LOOIJENGA K,HEILIG T. Stray current exchange between electric rail and underground utilities[C]//Corrosion 2007. Houston,TX:NACE International,2007:07644.
 
【21】刘军. 动态直流杂散电流干扰中极化试片电流测量[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2016,37(1):68-71.
 
【22】陈志光,秦朝葵,周策. 地铁检修基地杂散电流对燃气管道影响的实验研究[C]//2016油气田勘探与开发国际会议. 北京:西安石油大学,2016:588.
 
【23】GREENBERGER S. Parametric stray current monitoring and mitigation for electric rail stray current[C]//Corrosion 2005. Houston,TX:NACE International,2005:05249.
 
【24】LINDEMUTH D,KROON D. Light rail transit stray current control-how much water line protection is really[C]//Corrosion 2008. Houston,TX:NACE International,2008:08063.
 
【25】DE LAS CASAS R,TURNER R,ROE K. Dynamic stray current interference testing and mitigation design for a 90-inch water main[C]//Corroson 2009. Houston,TX:NACE International,2009:09547.
 
【26】陈志光,秦朝葵,夏沁. 轨道交通杂散电流对埋地燃气管道影响的实验研究[J]. 世界科技研究与发展,2012,34(5):740-742.
 
【27】埋地钢质管道阴极保护参数测量方法:GB/T 21246-2007[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
 
【28】埋地钢质管道直流干扰防护技术标准:GB 50991-2014[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2014.
 
【29】Cathodic protection of metals-pipes and cables:AS 2832.1-2015[S]. Sydney:Standards Australia International,2015.
 
【30】Protection against corrosion by stray current from direct current systems:BS EN 50162-2004[S].[S.l.]:BSI,2004.
 
【31】ZAKOWSKI K,SOKÓLSKI W. 24-hours characteristic of interaction on pipelines of stray currents leaking from tram tractions[J]. Corrosion Science,1999,41(11):2099-2111.
 
【32】FREIMAN L I. Stray-current corrosion criteria for underground steel pipelines[J]. Protection of Metals,2003,39(2):172-176.
 
【33】Committee RTD Executive Safety & Security. RTD design guidelines & criteria light rail design criteria[S]. Denver,Colorado:Engineering Division of the Regional Transportation District,201.
 
【34】陈志光,秦朝葵,唐继旭. 城市轨道交通动态杂散电流理论分析及计算[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,2014(3):24-29.
 
【35】柯甜甜,方江敏,钱瑶虹,等. 地铁杂散电流对埋地金属管道阴极保护的影响[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,2017(3):90-93.
 
【36】Control of external corrosion on underground or submerged metallic piping systems:NACE SP0169-2013[S]. Houston,TX:NACE International,2013.
 
【37】郭庆茹,何悟忠,冷旭耀,等. 对管道直流杂散电流干扰腐蚀的防治方法[J]. 油气储运,2003(4):46-48.
 
【38】MCCAFFREY K L. Cathodic protection design considerations for waterlines impacted by light rail construction[C]//Corrosion 2005. Houston,TX:NACE International,2005:05241.
 
【39】赵英新,单鲁文. 埋地燃气管道地铁杂散电流腐蚀的防护[J]. 煤气与热力,2014,34(1):5-8.
 
【40】DE LAS CASAS R. Dynamic stray current interference mitigation commissioning testing for a 90-inch (2.28 m) water main[C]//Corrosion 2011. Houston,TX:NACE International,2011:11340.
 
【41】HA T H,BAE J H,LEE H G,et al. Rapid potential-controlled rectifier for securing the underground pipeline under electrolytic interference[C]//PowerCon 2004. Singapore:IEEE,2004,1:537-541.
 
【42】HA Y C,KIM D K,BAE J H. Investigation of stray DC subway system in korea[C]//Corrosion 2005. Houston,TX:NACE International,2005:05620.
 
【43】杨永,何仁洋,李刚,等. 埋地钢质管道杂散电流的检测与防护[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2012,33(4):324-327.
 
【44】QIN H M,LU M X,WANG X Y,et al. Dynamic DC stray current interference investigation and mitigation design for a sacrificial anode protection pipeline[C]//Corrosion 2014. Houston,TX:NACE International,2014:4013.
 
【45】YUNOVICH M,THOMPSON N G. Coupon monitoring for cathodic protection optimization[C]//Corrosion 2002. Houston,TX:NACE International,2002:02103.
 
【46】LAZZARI L,ORMELLESE M,DURANTI F,et al. Stray current control by a new approach based on true potential monitoring[C]//Corrosion 2007. Houston,TX:NACE International,2007:07041.
 
【47】BRENNA A,LAZZARI L,ORMELLESE M. Stray current control by a new approach based on current monitoring on a potential probe[J]. Corrosion Engineering Science and Technology,2017,52(5):359-364.
 
【48】张超. 强制排流器在消除埋地金属管道杂散电流干扰中的应用[J]. 石油库与加油站,2017,26(3):4-7,52.
 
【49】HOSOKAWA Y,KAJIYAMA F. Case studies on the assessment of AC and DC interference using steel coupons with respect to current density CP criteria[C]//Corrosion 2006. Houston,TX:NACE International,2006:06161.
 
【50】韩非. 馈电试验在地铁杂散电流干扰排流中的应用[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2015,36(11):1101-1103.
 
【51】周吉祥. 城镇燃气管道直流杂散电流排流保护[J]. 煤气与热力,2015,35(4):38-42.
 
【52】BEGGS J. Preparing gas distribution piping for the construction of a light rail transit system[C]//Corrosion 2003. Houston,TX:NACE International,2003:03711.
 
【53】BAETÉ C,BORTELS L,DE GUSSEMÉ K,et al. Investigating railway corrosion caused by cathodic protection systems[C]//Corrosion 2015. Houston,TX:NACE International,2015:6015.
 
【54】娄志标,秦朝葵,夏沁,等. 基于Dymola的燃气管道杂散电流防护模型[J]. 油气储运,2014,33(9):983-987.
 
相关信息
   标题 相关频次
 城镇基础设施对油气管道的干扰规律及其识别方法
 4
 X52钢在含H2S/CO2混合气体的三甘醇溶液中的腐蚀行为
 3
 站场埋地管道超声导波检测技术应用
 3
 3PE防腐蚀层联合阴极保护对管道的保护效果
 2
 ACVG与CIPS技术在埋地管道防腐蚀评价中的组合应用
 2
 SF6示踪法在埋地管道检漏中的应用
 2
 不同喷丸强度下镍铝青铜的表面喷丸强化效果
 2
 厂外排水管道交流稳态干扰防护设计
 2
 超声导波检测技术在埋地占压管道检测与风险分析中的应用
 2
 定向钻穿越管道防腐蚀层及阴极保护的评价方法
 2
 钢质套管对埋地管道阴极保护的影响
 2
 高压线对埋地管道稳态干扰影响规律的模拟
 2
 管道衰减系数对超声导波检测距离的影响
 2
 基于埋地金属管道杂散电流的腐蚀与防护
 2
 交流电气化铁路杂散电流对埋地管道电位影响规律
 2
 交流杂散电流干扰对埋地管道阴极保护电位的影响
 2
 绝缘防腐蚀层缺陷对油气管线阴极保护中IR降的影响
 2
 邻近强电线路时埋地管道交流腐蚀的可能性评估
 2
 埋地钢质管道常用外腐蚀检测技术的适用性
 2
 埋地钢质管道防腐蚀层检测中地表电位的ANSYS模拟
 2
 埋地钢质管道外覆盖层缺陷检测与评价系统的开发
 2
 埋地钢质管道杂散电流腐蚀研究现状
 2
 埋地管道3PE防腐蚀层阴极剥离产物分析
 2
 埋地管道防腐蚀层阴极剥离影响因素
 2
 埋地管道无损检测技术
 2
 埋地管道泄漏监测检测技术
 2
 埋地管道阴极保护电位测量方法研究进展
 2
 埋地管道阴极保护系统失效原因分析及对策
 2
 埋地管道与高压交流输电线之间的安全距离
 2
 密间隔电位测量(CIPS)中通断周期对埋地管道阴极保护系统的影响
 2